United States of America v. Marty Lorenzo Wright

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7064
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MARTY LORENZO WRIGHT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (CR-95-39, CR-95-44, CA-99-112-4)
Submitted: November 28, 2001 Decided: January 15, 2002
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Bryan Rigney, PROTOGYROU & RIGNEY, P.L.C., Norfolk, Vir-
ginia, for Appellant. Michael R. Smythers, Assistant United States
Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Marty Lorenzo Wright seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-
ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. See United States v. Wright, Nos. CR-95-39; CR-95-44; CA-
99-112-4 (E.D. Va. Apr. 30, 2001). We deny Wright’s motion for the
appointment of counsel at the Government’s expense and dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --