The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7051•United States of America v. Eric Dewayne Spencer, a/k/a High School
01-7051Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 29, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7051
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ERIC DEWAYNE SPENCER, a/k/a High School,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief
District Judge. (CR-99-12)
Submitted: October 18, 2001 Decided: October 29, 2001
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric Dewayne Spencer, Appellant Pro Se. Monica Kaminski Schwartz,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eric Dewayne Spencer appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for new trial and subsequent motion for recon-
sideration of that denial. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. According-
ly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. Spencer, No.
CR-99-12 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 30 & June 4, 2001). We further deny
Spencer’s motions for injunctive relief and for designation of
records. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.