James E. Williams v. United States of America

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7044
JAMES E. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; STATE OF NORTH CARO-
LINA; STATE OF GEORGIA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-01-325-CT)
Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 5, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James E. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

* The order to particularize also denied relief on Williams’
claims pertaining to an allegedly illegal extradition. Williams
failed to address this portion of the district court’s order in his
informal brief, and therefore further review of these claims is
waived. 4th Cir. Local R. 34(b).
2
PER CURIAM:
James E. Williams appeals from the district court’s orders
directing him to particularize his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.
2001) complaint and dismissing his action for failure to comply.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. * Williams v. United States, No. CA-01-325-
CT (E.D.N.C. filed May 30, 2001; entered June 5, 2001). We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --