The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7034•United States of America v. Raymond Edward James
01-7034Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 11, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7034
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RAYMOND EDWARD JAMES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District
Judge. (CR-85-12)
Submitted: December 19, 2001 Decided: January 11, 2002
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond Edward James, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Raymond Edward James appeals the district court’s order deny-
ing his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a) motion. Our review of the record
discloses this appeal is meritless. We simply do not agree with
James’ argument that his sentence of life imprisonment, imposed in
1985 upon his conviction for violating 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113(e) (West
2000), is illegal. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.