The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6994•United States of America v. Beatriz Corporan-Cuevas
01-6994Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 27, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6994
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
BEATRIZ CORPORAN-CUEVAS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Hebert N. Maletz, Senior Judge, sitting by
designation. (CR-92-409-WMN, CA-00-2665-HNM)
Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: September 27, 2001
Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Beatriz Corporan-Cuevas, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell,
Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Beatriz Corporan-Cuevas seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-
icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of
the district court. See United States v. Corporan-Cuevas, Nos. CR-
92-409-WMN; CA-00-2665-HNM (D. Md. filed May 18, 2001; entered May
21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.