The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6977•United States of America v. Greg Leo Wilson
01-6977Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 17, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6977
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GREG LEO WILSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CR-96-41, CA-99-10)
Submitted: August 9, 2001 Decided: August 17, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Greg Leo Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Greg Leo Wilson seeks to appeal the district court’s order de-
nying his Rule 60(b) motion of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
seeking relief from the court’s denial of his motion filed under 28
U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States
v. Wilson, Nos. CR-96-41; CA-99-10 (W.D. Va. May 17, 2001). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.