Karriem Wali Muhammad v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 2000 , under § 2241, we note that he cannot demon- strate…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6955
KARRIEM WALI MUHAMMAD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; JOHN
ASHCROFT,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-01-
1397-MJG)
Submitted: August 17, 2001 Decided: October 23, 2001
Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Karriem Wali Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

* Assuming with deciding that Muhammad could assert a claim
pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey,
530 U.S. 466 (2000), under § 2241, we note that he cannot demon-
strate error because his sentences did not exceed the applicable
statutory maximums. See United States v. Angle, No. 99-4662 slip
op. at 5 (4th Cir. June 29, 2001) (en banc) (published).
2
PER CURIAM:
Karriem Wali Muhammad appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the rea-
soning of the district court. See Muhammad v. United States, No.
CA-01-1397-MJG (D. Md. May 22, 2001). * We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --