The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6936•United States of America v. Kenneth Eugene McDaniel
01-6936Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 16, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6936
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
KENNETH EUGENE MCDANIEL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CR-94-111, CA-00-90-3-MU)
Submitted: October 31, 2001 Decided: November 16, 2001
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Eugene McDaniel, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Eugene McDaniel appeals from the district court’s
orders dismissing with prejudice his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
2001) motion and denying his motion to reinstate/reconsider. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-
ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. McDaniel, Nos. CR-94-111; CA-00-90-3-MU
(W.D.N.C. Mar. 29, 2001 & filed Apr. 30, 2001; entered May 4,
2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.