United States of America v. Tamara Llamas, a/k/a Tamara Deyton, a/k/a Tamara Mullins, a/k/a Tamara Smith, a/k/a…

01-6934Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 11, 2001

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6934
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TAMARA LLAMAS, a/k/a Tamara Deyton, a/k/a
Tamara Mullins, a/k/a Tamara Smith, a/k/a
Tammy,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CR-97-63-H, CA-00-254-7-H)
Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 11, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tamara Llamas, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant
United States Attorney, J. Frank Bradsher, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Tamara Llamas seeks to appeal the district court’s order de-
nying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
district court. United States v. Llamas, Nos. CR-97-63-H; CA-00-
254-7-H (E.D.N.C. filed Apr. 5, 2001; entered Apr. 9, 2001). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.