Brian Lynn Ellis v. JOSEPH PICKLESIMER, Superintendent

01-6905Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 26, 2001

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6905
BRIAN LYNN ELLIS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JOSEPH PICKLESIMER, Superintendent; STATE OF
NORTH CAROLINA,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Russell A. Eliason, Magistrate
Judge. (CA-00-1167-1)
Submitted: October 18, 2001 Decided: October 26, 2001
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brian Lynn Ellis, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

* The parties consented to jurisdiction of the magistrate
judge under 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West 1993 & supp. 2001).
2
PER CURIAM:
Brian Lynn Ellis appeals from the magistrate judge’s order*
denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West
1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the magistrate
judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-
soning of the magistrate judge. Ellis v. Picklesimer, No. CA-00-
1167-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 11, 2001). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.