The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6896•Calvin Robinson-Bey v. THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden
01-6896Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 31, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6896
CALVIN ROBINSON-BEY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-00-
3452-L)
Submitted: October 19, 2001 Decided: October 31, 2001
Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Calvin Robinson-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Douglas Eason, Assis-
tant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Calvin Robinson-Bey appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition and denying
his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the
reasoning of the district court. Robinson-Bey v. Corcoran, No. CA-
00-3452-L (D. Md. Apr. 12, 2001; filed April 27, 2001, entered
April 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.