The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6886•Edgar Flemming v. J. BRYANT DIEHL, Chief of South Carolina Department of Corrections Canteen Branch
01-6886Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 5, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6886
EDGAR FLEMMING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
J. BRYANT DIEHL, Chief of South Carolina
Department of Corrections Canteen Branch;
REPUBLIC TOBACCO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-99-2691-3-18BC)
Submitted: August 23, 2001 Decided: September 5, 2001
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edgar Flemming, Appellant Pro Se. Terry B. Millar, TERRY B.
MILLAR, L.L.C., Rock Hill, South Carolina; Thomas Frank Dougall,
Jeffrey L. Shaw, BOWERS, ORR & DOUGALL, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Edgar Flemming appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Flemming v. Diehl, No. CA-99-2691-3-18BC
(D.S.C. Apr. 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.