The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6882•Willie Ellis v. J. E. GUNJA, Warden, Federal Correctional In- stitution, Cumberland
01-6882Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 14, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6882
WILLIE ELLIS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
J. E. GUNJA, Warden, Federal Correctional In-
stitution, Cumberland; HARRELL WATTS, Adminis-
trator, National Inmate Appeal, Federal Bureau
of Prisons,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-
01-318-CCB)
Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 14, 2001
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie Ellis, Appellant Pro Se. Ariana Wright Arnold, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Willie Ellis appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the rec-
ord and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Ellis v. Gunja, No. CA-01-318-CCB (D. Md. May 15, 2001). We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.