The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6862•United States of America v. James Edward Dawkins
01-6862Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 5, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6862
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JAMES EDWARD DAWKINS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (CR-95-9-V, CA-98-32-5-2-V)
Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 5, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Edward Dawkins, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Edward Dawkins appeals from the district court’s order
declining to grant Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) relief from the final
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) motion.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in
forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss on
the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Dawkins,
Nos. CR-95-9-V; CA-98-32-5-2-V (W.D.N.C. filed May 1, 2001; entered
May 9, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.