The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6852•Carnell Hunnicutt v. Virginia Department of Corrections
01-6852Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 17, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6852
CARNELL HUNNICUTT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; R. A.
YOUNG; S. K. YOUNG; A. P. HARVEY; R. B.
PHILLIPS; CHAPLAIN MITCHELL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District
Judge. (CA-01-254-7)
Submitted: August 9, 2001 Decided: August 17, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carnell Hunnicutt, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Carnell Hunnicutt appeals the district court’s order dismiss-
ing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint for failure
to comply with the conditional filing order. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Hunnicutt v. Virginia Dep’t of Corrections, No. CA-01-254-7
(W.D. Va. Apr. 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.