The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6834•Charles D. Bryant, Jr v. RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director
01-6834Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 27, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6834
CHARLES D. BRYANT, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director; DAVID A.
GARRAGHTY, Warden,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.
(CA-00-608-3)
Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: September 27, 2001
Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles D. Bryant, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells,
Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate
judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73.
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles D. Bryant, Jr., seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s
order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254
(West 1994 & Supp. 2001). * We have reviewed the record and the
magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the ap-
peal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Bryant v. Angelone,
No. CA-00-608-3 (E.D. Va. Apr. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.