(CR-90-84, CA-01-35-1-V) United States of America v. Andre Brown

Filed: September 24, 2001
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6826
(CR-90-84, CA-01-35-1-V)
United States of America,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
Andre Brown,
Defendant - Appellant.
O R D E R
The court amends its opinion filed September 18, 2001, as
follows:
On the cover sheet, section 5 -- the panel information is
corrected to read “Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit
Judges.”
For the Court - By Direction
/s/ Patricia S. Connor
Clerk

-- 1 of 3 --

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6826
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ANDRE BROWN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (CR-90-84, CA-01-35-1-V)
Submitted: September 6, 2001 Decided: September 18, 2001
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andre Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Andre Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying
his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-
ability and dismiss substantially on the reasoning of the district
court. See United States v. Brown, Nos. CR-90-84; CA-01-35-1-V
(W.D.N.C. filed Mar. 1, entered Mar. 6, 2001). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --