Harry James Fowler v. Roger Hutchings

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6805
HARRY JAMES FOWLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROGER HUTCHINGS; LIEUTENANT HARTSO, a/k/a
Marvin Hartso; DEPUTY CORNETT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CA-98-9-5-2-MU)
Submitted: September 6, 2001 Decided: September 13, 2001
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harry James Fowler, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Lee Davis, Jr., DAVIS
& HAMRICK, L.L.P., Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Harry James Fowler appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Fowler v. Hutchings, No. CA-98-9-5-2-MU
(W.D.N.C. filed Mar. 29, 2001; entered Apr. 4, 2001). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --