The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6785•Howard Perry Stafford v. WARDEN, Marion Correctional Treatment Center
01-6785Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 18, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6785
HOWARD PERRY STAFFORD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WARDEN, Marion Correctional Treatment Center;
MAYS WILSON TATE, JR.; JAMES DENNY, Correc-
tional Officer; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CA-01-229)
Submitted: September 6, 2001 Decided: September 18, 2001
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Howard Perry Stafford, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Howard Perry Stafford appeals the district court’s order de-
nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Stafford v. Warden, Marion Corr. Treat-
ment Ctr., No. CA-01-229 (W.D. Va. Apr. 27, 2001). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.