The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6778•United States of America v. James Harrison Singletary
01-6778Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 5, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6778
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JAMES HARRISON SINGLETARY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (CR-98-240-4, CA-00-2332-4-22)
Submitted: July 31, 2001 Decided: September 5, 2001
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Harrison Singletary, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker
Bethea, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Harrison Singletary seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-
icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of
the district court. See United States v. Singletary, Nos. CR-98-
240-4; CA-00-2332-4-22 (D.S.C. filed Apr. 5, 2001; entered Apr. 6,
2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.