Antoine Knightnor v. Ron Angelone

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6744
ANTOINE KNIGHTNOR; DEMETRICE MURRAY,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
RON ANGELONE; G. JOHNSON; R. A. YOUNG; PAGE
TRUE; ELSWICK; J. ARMENTROUT; BARTON; R.
AUSTIN; J. BENTLEY; B. EDMONDS; JOHN DOE; L.
FLEMING; D. MILLS; R. RITER; D. ARMSTRONG; M.
PAIR; MR. BAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-00-232-7)
Submitted: August 28, 2001 Decided: September 11, 2001
Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antoine Knightnor, Demetrice Murray, Appellants Pro Se. Pamela
Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Antoine Knightnor and Demetrice Murray appeal the district
court order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants in
this civil action challenging Division Operating Procedure 864, a
prison grooming policy. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s memorandum opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Knightnor v. Angelone, CA-00-232-7 (W.D. Va. Apr. 6, 2001). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --