The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6743•United States of America v. Tarus D. Owens
01-6743Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 5, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6743
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TARUS D. OWENS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
(CR-97-150)
Submitted: September 25, 2001 Decided: November 5, 2001
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tarus D. Owens, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tarus Owens appeals the district court’s order denying his
motion filed under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582 (West Supp. 2001) and con-
strued as a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) motion. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-
ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. See United States v. Owens, No. CR-97-150 (E.D. Va. Apr.
12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.