The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6716•St. Clair A. Allmond v. CHRISTOPHER PREUSS, Sergeant
01-6716Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 5, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6716
ST. CLAIR A. ALLMOND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CHRISTOPHER PREUSS, Sergeant; ERVIN J. TAYLOR,
Officer; VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY PO-
LICE DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
(CA-01-246-2)
Submitted: June 21, 2001 Decided: July 5, 2001
Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
St. Clair A. Allmond, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
St. Clair A. Allmond appeals the district court’s order deny-
ing relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. Allmond v. Preuss, No. CA-01-246-2 (E.D.
Va. Apr. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.