The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6685•Ephrain Reliford, Jr v. Laura Paige
01-6685Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 17, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6685
EPHRAIN RELIFORD, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LAURA PAIGE; JACKALEANE LAWSON; CAPTAIN DON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-00-210-17BC-3)
Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: October 17, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ephrain Reliford, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Vinton DeVane Lide, VINTON
D. LIDE & ASSOCIATES, Lexington, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ephrain Reliford, Jr., appeals the district court’s order de-
nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Reliford v. Paige, No. CA-00-210-17BC-3 (D.S.C.
filed Mar. 30, 2001; entered Apr. 4, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.