Isaac Eugene Slappy v. Diehl, No. CA-99- 3125-3-18BC D.S.C. filed Mar. 22, 2001

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6684
ISAAC EUGENE SLAPPY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
JEFFERY RAY ADDY; MANSA MUSA BANSHEE,
Plaintiffs,
versus
J. BRYANT DIEHL; TOP REPUBLIC TOBACCO,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 01-6795
JEFFERY RAY ADDY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
ISAAC EUGENE SLAPPY; MANSA MUSA BANSHEE,
Plaintiffs,

-- 1 of 3 --

2
versus
J. BRYANT DIEHL; TOP REPUBLIC TOBACCO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-99-3125-3-18BC)
Submitted: July 12, 2001 Decided: July 20, 2001
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Isaac Eugene Slappy, Jeffery Ray Addy, Appellants Pro Se. Terry B.
Millar, TERRY B. MILLAR, L.L.C., Rock Hill, South Carolina; Thomas
Frank Dougall, BOWERS, ORR & DOUGALL, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Isaac Eugene Slappy and Jeffery Ray Addy appeal the district
court’s orders denying relief on their motions for relief from
judgment. We have reviewed the records and the district court’s
opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Addy v. Diehl, No. CA-99-
3125-3-18BC (D.S.C. filed Mar. 22, 2001; entered Mar. 23, 2001;
filed and entered Mar. 26, 2001). We deny Addy’s motion for
appointment of counsel on appeal. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --