The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6683•Samuel Williams Ferebee v. Jerry G. Monette
01-6683Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 15, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6683
SAMUEL WILLIAMS FEREBEE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JERRY G. MONETTE; GEORGE L. ADKINS; ELLA
BULLOCK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Joseph C. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-00-87-5-H)
Submitted: October 24, 2001 Decided: November 15, 2001
Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marvin R. Sparrow, SPARROW & VANDENBERG, Durham, North Carolina,
for Appellant. Scott C. Hart, SUMRELL, SUGG, CARMICHAEL, HICKS &
HART, P.A., New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Samuel Williams Ferebee appeals the district court’s order de-
nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. Ferebee v. Monette, No. CA-00-87-5-H
(E.D.N.C. filed Mar.14, 2001; entered Mar. 15, 2001). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.