David James Flowers v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6672
DAVID JAMES FLOWERS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;
CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of South
Carolina,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-00-420-20BD)
Submitted: August 9, 2001 Decided: August 15, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David James Flowers, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Eric Petersen, SOUTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina;
Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
David James Flowers appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recom-
mendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on
the reasoning of the district court. See Flowers v. South Carolina
Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-00-420-20BD (D.S.C. Mar. 26, 2001).
Flowers’ motion for a certificate of probable cause is denied. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --