Anthony L. Odom v. B. SOLES, Superintendent

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6669
ANTHONY L. ODOM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
B. SOLES, Superintendent; LIEUTENANT HAWKS;
LIEUTENANT MATEEN; W. HENCE, Correctional
Officer; GLENN LIVESAY, Maintenance Man; MS.
GRAY, Nurse,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.
(CA-00-841-AM)
Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: August 2, 2001
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony L. Odom, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Foster Barr, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony L. Odom appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. Odom v. Soles, No. CA-00-841-AM (E.D. Va. filed
Apr. 3, 2001; entered Apr. 4, 2001). We deny Odom’s motion for
appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --