The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6664•Jeffrey S. Adkins v. Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Vir- Ginia
01-6664Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 5, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6664
JEFFREY S. ADKINS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIR-
GINIA; EDWARD W. MURRAY,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CA-93-215-R)
Submitted: August 10, 2001 Decided: September 5, 2001
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey S. Adkins, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Quentin Harris,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey S. Adkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion for reconsideration of the dismissal
of his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.
2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant permission
to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability,
and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
Adkins v. Attorney Gen., No. CA-93-215-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 5, 2001).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.