The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6620•Charles Anton McKain v. JOSEPH M. BROOKS, Warden, FCI, Petersburg
01-6620Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 24, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6620
CHARLES ANTON MCKAIN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JOSEPH M. BROOKS, Warden, FCI, Petersburg;
JANET RENO, Attorney General; UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CA-01-75)
Submitted: July 12, 2001 Decided: July 24, 2001
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Anton McKain, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Anton McKain appeals the district court’s order dis-
missing without prejudice his petition for a writ of habeas corpus
filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994). We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s memorandum and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
McKain v. Brooks, No. CA-01-75 (E.D. Va. Mar. 8, 2001). We grant
McKain leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.