The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6604•United States of America v. Jordanie Lacorse, a/k/a Joe Danny, a/k/a Joe Denny
01-6604Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 10, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6604
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JORDANIE LACORSE, a/k/a Joe Danny, a/k/a Joe
Denny,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Salisbury. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CR-97-114, CA-99-1108-1)
Submitted: August 31, 2001 Decided: October 10, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jordanie Lacorse, Appellant Pro Se. Clifton Thomas Barrett,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jordanie Lacorse seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
district court. United States v. Lacorse, Nos. CR-97-114; CA-99-
1108-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Mar. 15, 2001; entered Mar. 16, 2001). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.