Francis Nwankwo v. WARDEN, LSCI-Butner

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6601
FRANCIS NWANKWO,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
WARDEN, LSCI-Butner,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-00-831)
Submitted: January 15, 2002 Decided: January 29, 2002
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cheryl J. Sturm, Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania, for Appellant. John
Stuart Bruce, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant
United States Attorney, R. A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States
Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Francis Nwankwo appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of
the district court. Nwankwo v. Warden, No. CA-00-831 (E.D.N.C.
Feb. 15, 2001); see United States v. White, 238 F.3d 537, 542-43
(4th Cir.) (holding that when there are multiple counts of con-
viction, statutory maximum sentence on each count may be aggregated
to reach the appropriate sentence within the applicable guidelines
range), cert. denied, U.S. , 121 S. Ct. 2235 (2001); In re
Jones, 226 F.3d 328, 329-30 (4th Cir. 2000) (explaining applicabil-
ity of savings clause in 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --