The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6598•Lawrence E. Griffin v. MICHELLE ELZIE, Warden
01-6598Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 2, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6598
LAWRENCE E. GRIFFIN,
Movant - Appellant,
versus
MICHELLE ELZIE, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CA-01-3-3)
Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: August 2, 2001
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence E. Griffin, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence E. Griffin appeals the district court’s order denying
his petition for mandamus relief. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion accepting the report and recommen-
dation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we grant Griffin’s motion to amend his pleading and
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Griffin v.
Elzie, No. CA-01-3-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 29, 2001). We deny Griffin’s
motion for appointment of counsel and his motion captioned “Appel-
late Revised Petition Remanding Motion to Dismiss.” We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.