The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6561•Cedric Boyd v. CAPTAIN GREGORY, Correctional Officer
01-6561Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 29, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6561
CEDRIC BOYD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CAPTAIN GREGORY, Correctional Officer; SER-
GEANT EVERTON, Supervisor of C Platoon,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-01-204-2)
Submitted: May 17, 2001 Decided: May 29, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cedric Boyd, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Cedric Boyd appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Boyd v. Gregory, No. CA-01-204-2 (E.D. Va.
Mar. 29, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.