United States of America v. Corey Lorenzo Woodfolk

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6560
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
COREY LORENZO WOODFOLK,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 01-6621
COREY LORENZO WOODFOLK,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
(CR-93-419-JFM, CA-01-727-JFM)
Submitted: August 24, 2001 Decided: October 2, 2001

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Corey Lorenzo Woodfolk, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Corey Lorenzo Woodfolk appeals the district court’s orders de-
nying his motion to vacate judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4)
and denying his petition for writ of mandamus. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Woodfolk, No. CR-93-419-JFM (D. Md. Mar.
22, 2001); Woodfolk v. United States, No. CA-01-727-JFM (D. Md.
Apr. 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --