The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6487•United States of America v. JOSEPH JOHNSON, JR., a/k/a Joseph R. Johnson, a/k/a Joe Johnson, Jr
01-6487Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 29, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6487
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JOSEPH JOHNSON, JR., a/k/a Joseph R. Johnson,
a/k/a Joe Johnson, Jr.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CR-96-180-A)
Submitted: August 23, 2001 Decided: August 29, 2001
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Johnson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Neil Hammerstrom,
Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Johnson, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order
denying his motion to dismiss the indictment for lack of personal
and subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United
States v. Johnson, No. CR-96-180-A (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 15, 2001;
entered Mar. 20, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.