The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6477•LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL, SR., on behalf of Lloyd Maxwell, Jr v. Warden, Wicomico County Detention Center
01-6477Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 11, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6477
LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL, SR., on behalf of Lloyd
Maxwell, Jr.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
WARDEN, WICOMICO COUNTY DETENTION CENTER,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-01-
428-L)
Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 11, 2001
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lloyd George Maxwell, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lloyd Maxwell, Sr., a federal inmate, appeals the district
court’s order dismissing without prejudice the 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(1994) petition he filed on behalf of his son. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Maxwell v. Warden, Wicomico County Det. Ctr., No. CA-
01-428-L (D. Md. filed Feb. 26, 2001; entered Feb. 27, 2001). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.