James Guy Arnold v. Edward J. Rudloff

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6445
JAMES GUY ARNOLD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
EDWARD J. RUDLOFF; KATHY A. PALMER; STEPHEN W.
WATERS, D. ROWLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater,
District Judge. (CA-00-105-3)
Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: September 26, 2001
Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Guy Arnold, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
James Guy Arnold appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Arnold v. Rudloff, No. CA-00-105-3 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 2, 2001).
Further, we deny Arnold’s motion for appointment of counsel. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --