The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6442•United States of America v. Ronald Lee Wilson
01-6442Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 3, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6442
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RONALD LEE WILSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (CR-97-866, CA-00-3001-4-22)
Submitted: June 21, 2001 Decided: July 3, 2001
Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Lee Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. William Earl Day, II, As-
sistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Lee Wilson seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying as untimely his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West
Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-
tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
of the district court. United States v. Wilson, Nos. CR-97-866;
CA-00-3001-4-22 (D.S.C. Jan. 25, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.