The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6434•Michael Terrell Cook v. B.A. BLEDSOE, Warden
01-6434Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 29, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6434
MICHAEL TERRELL COOK,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
B.A. BLEDSOE, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee,
and
KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER,
Respondent.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief
District Judge. (CA-00-60-1)
Submitted: August 23, 2001 Decided: August 29, 2001
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Terrell Cook, Appellant Pro Se. Patrick Michael Flatley,
Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Michael Terrell Cook appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition, declining
to reconsider the denial of relief, and refusing to release Cook on
bond pending disposition of this appeal. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s orders and opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Cook v. Bledsoe, No. CA-00-60-1 (N.D.W. Va.
Mar. 5, 2001; Feb. 7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.