The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6395•United States of America v. Ricky Darden
01-6395Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 11, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6395
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RICKY DARDEN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CR-
93-447, CA-99-2874-PJM)
Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 11, 2001
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ricky Darden, Appellant Pro Se. Brent Jefferson Gurney, Assistant
United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ricky Darden appeals the district court’s order denying his
motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000), and a sub-
sequent order denying his motion for a certificate of appeal-
ability. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-
tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
of the district court. See United States v. Darden, Nos. CR-93-
447; CA-99-2874-PJM (D. Md. filed Nov. 30, 2000, entered Feb. 8,
2001; filed Mar. 1, 2001, entered Mar. 6, 2001). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.