The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6374•Steffan J. Lusby v. L.J. RANDOLPH, Business Manager
01-6374Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 30, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6374
STEFFAN J. LUSBY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
L.J. RANDOLPH, Business Manager; RON ANGELONE,
Director of Department of Corrections,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.
(CA-00-1926-AM)
Submitted: July 17, 2001 Decided: July 30, 2001
Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steffan J. Lusby, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Steffan J. Lusby appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint for
failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A(b)(1) (West
Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Lusby v. Randolph, No.
CA-00-1926-AM (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 19, 2000; entered Feb. 20,
2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.