Elmer K. Floyd v. Alton Baskerville

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6311
ELMER K. FLOYD,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
ALTON BASKERVILLE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.
(CA-00-437-3)
Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 7, 2001
Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elmer K. Floyd, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

* This case was decided by a magistrate judge upon consent of
the parties under 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c)(1) (West 1993 & Supp. 2000).
2
PER CURIAM:
Elmer Floyd appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying re-
lief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &
Supp. 2000).* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate
judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-
soning of the magistrate judge. See Floyd v. Baskerville, No. CA-
00-437-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --