In re: Roy Kwaczala

01-6305Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 23, 2001

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6305
In Re: ROY KWACZALA,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-93-142)
Submitted: April 12, 2001 Decided: April 23, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roy Kwaczala, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Roy Kwaczala filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking
to have this court issue an order directing the district court to
act on his petition for writ of error coram nobis. He requested
leave to proceed in forma pauperis with regard to his mandamus
petition. A review of the district court docket reveals that the
district court recently denied Kwaczala’s petition for writ of
error coram nobis. See Kwaczala v. United States, No. CR-93-142
(W.D.N.C. Mar. 6, 2001). Accordingly, although we grant Kwaczala’s
motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we dismiss the
mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.