The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6291•Brinston Wilson v. D. L. HOBBS, Warden of Federal Correctional Institution-Jesup
01-6291Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 11, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6291
BRINSTON WILSON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
D. L. HOBBS, Warden of Federal Correctional
Institution-Jesup; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-00-3864-6-20-AK)
Submitted: July 10, 2001 Decided: September 11, 2001
Before WILLIAMS and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brinston Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Brinston Wilson appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 1994) petition. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Wilson v. Hobbs, No. CA-00-3864-6-20-AK (D.S.C.
filed Jan. 29, 2001; entered Jan. 31, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.