The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6279•George J. Taylor v. Ronald Hutchinson
01-6279Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 25, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6279
GEORGE J. TAYLOR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RONALD HUTCHINSON; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE
STATE OF MARYLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-01-24-AW)
Submitted: May 17, 2001 Decided: May 25, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George J. Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
George J. Taylor appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his motion, which the district court properly construed as a 28
U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and order and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Taylor’s motion for a certificate of appeal-
ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. Taylor v. Hutchinson, No. CA-01-24-AW (D. Md. filed Jan.
17, 2001; entered Jan. 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.