The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6273•United States of America v. Gerold Lee Davis
01-6273Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 25, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6273
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GEROLD LEE DAVIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenwood. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-93-429)
Submitted: October 18, 2001 Decided: October 25, 2001
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gerold Lee Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings Caughman,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gerold Lee Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion to modify his sentence. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. United States v. Davis, No. CR-93-429 (D.S.C. Jan.
25, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.