The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6194•Aaron Headspeth v. JOYCE K. CONLEY, Warden
01-6194Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 11, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6194
AARON HEADSPETH,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JOYCE K. CONLEY, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Charles H. Haden II, Chief
District Judge. (CA-99-485-5)
Submitted: June 29, 2001 Decided: September 11, 2001
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aaron Headspeth, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Aaron Headspeth appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000) petition.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Headspeth v. Conley, No. CA-99-485-5 (S.D.W.
Va. Jan. 4, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.