The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6189•Jimmie Hugene Woodson, Sr v. Governor Jim Gilmore
01-6189Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 20, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6189
JIMMIE HUGENE WOODSON, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GOVERNOR JIM GILMORE; WARDEN ALTON
BASKERVILLE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge.
(CA-00-952-2)
Submitted: March 9, 2001 Decided: March 20, 2001
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jimmie H. Woodson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jimmie H. Woodson, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Woodson v.
Gilmore, No. CA-00-952-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 23, 2001). Furthermore, we
find this appeal frivolous for purposes of 28 U.S.C.A. §
1915(e)(2), (g) (West Supp. 2000). We deny Woodson’s motions for
release from incarceration, his motion for transfer, and his motion
to dismiss counsel appointed by the State of Virginia. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.