The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-6188•Nathaniel Smith Thurston, Jr v. Mickey Ray
01-6188Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 30, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6188
NATHANIEL SMITH THURSTON, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
MICKEY RAY; UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.
(CA-00-20-3-24BC)
Submitted: March 22, 2001 Decided: March 30, 2001
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathaniel Smith Thurston, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Smith Thurston, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) motion. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. Thurston v. Ray, No. CA-00-20-3-24BC (D.S.C.
filed Jan. 11, 2001; entered Jan. 16, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.